• Skip to main content
BC

biochimica clinica

en_US English
en_US English it_IT Italian
  • Home
  • Casi clinici
  • Ahead of print e Ultimo Fascicolo - Accedi per visualizzare gli articoli
  • Archivio BC fino a 2024
  • Sottometti un articolo
  • Norme Autori
  • Cerca

CONTRIBUTI SCIENTIFICI – Scientific Papers

Volume:

Biochimica Clinica 2019; 43(2) 135-142

Pubblicato on-line:

April 12, 2019

DOI:

10.19186/BC_2019.016

Scarica in PDF:
Autenticazione richiesta

Garantire la comparabilità dei risultati nel rispetto dei requisiti di qualità e delle esigenze organizzative: l’esempio di una procedura operativa

AUTORI

Andrea Padoan1,2, Giorgia Antonelli1,2, Ada Aita1,2, Laura Sciacovelli2 , Mario Plebani1,2,
1Dipartimento di Medicina-DIMED, Università degli Studi di Padova
2Unità Operativa Complessa Medicina di Laboratorio, Azienda Ospedale-Università di Padova

ABSTRACT

How to guarantee the comparability of test results in compliance with the quality requirements andorganizational needs: the example of an operative procedure

Medical laboratories are responsible for the qualityof test results, also when the same patient sample is evaluated using different analytical systems within the same lab.Indeed, as stated by ISO 15189:2012, laboratories should define means to compare procedures for evaluating thecomparability of patients’ samples results within the same healthcare system. In this study we report the approachused to define a procedure for assessing results comparability, developed in our laboratory before the ISO15189:2012 accreditation in 2016. Firstly, the approach was focused on the identification of all the different situationsthat may potentially require alignment of test results within the laboratory. Therefore, after evaluating guidelines anddocuments available in the literature, we defined a workflow applicable both to quantitative and qualitative methods.For quantitative methods, bias was estimated by means of statistical analyses such as Bland Altman and PassingBablok. For qualitative methods, results comparability was assessed by concordance. Criteria for defining theacceptability of systematic errors were also included in the procedure.

BIBLIOGRAFIA

HOME
PRIVACY POLICY
5x1000 Docemus

LOGO SIBioC

EDITORE RESPONSABILE
Alberto Oliaro

EDITORIAL SECRETARY
Edizioni Minerva Medica S.p.A.
Corso Bramante 83-85, 10126 Torino
T +39 011 678282
journals.dept@minervamedica.it

Designed by Biomedia srl
© 2025 SIBioC
P. IVA IT 06484860967