Un caso complesso di attribuzione di paternita’
A complex case of paternity testing

AUTORI

ABSTRACT

A complex case of paternity testing

The report describes a complex case of paternity identification managed at Forensic Genetic laboratory of CEINGE Advanced Biotecnology in Naples (Italy). A woman requested a paternity testing to know whether a man was the father of her child. Buccal swabs were used to obtain DNA specimens. The child’s autosomal profile presented a mixed profile. After exclusion of possible sources of contamination, this scenario was compatible with a mother/son mixture. Actually, the child, affected by acute lymphoblastic leukemia, underwent to an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with his mother as donor a few years before. The PowerQuant® System highlighted a concentration autosomal/Y ratio of almost 2. In the absence of the recipient’s autosomal profile prior the transplant, the known maternal profile and the mixed child profile were compared locus by locus. The pairs of mother-son alleles for each locus were identified applying the deconvolution rules of the two contributors in the mixture, where one of them is known. Hence, we chose the most probable pair, considering the profile mixture ratio woman/man of 1.8. According to the International Society for Forensic Genetics guidelines, the biostatistical interpretation was based on a likelihood ratio (LR) approach. Furthermore, LRmix and Familias 3 software were used to interpret the mixture and the kinship. This case highlights that we should bear in mind the possible occurrence of chimerism in reference material derived from buccal swabs, if a subject had an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In similar case, other specimens, like hair roots, should be used, provided that they are available

BIBLIOGRAFIA

1. Bär W, Brinkmann B, Budowle B, Carracedo A, Gill P, Lincoln P, et al. DNA recommendations. Further report of the DNA Commission of the ISFG regarding the use of short tandem repeat systems. Forensic Sci Int 1997;87:179-84.
2. Gill P, Curran J, Neumann C, Kirkham A, Clayton T, Whitaker J, et al. Interpretation of complex DNA proles using empirical models and a method to measure their robustness. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2008;2:91-103.
   Lion T, Watzinger F, Preuner S, Kreyenberg H, Tilanus M, de Weger R, et al, The EuroChimerism concept for a standardized approach to chimerism analysis after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Leukemia 2012; 26:1821-8.
3. Clark JR, Scott SD, Jack AL, Lee H, Mason J, Carter GI, et al. Monitoring of chimerism following allogeneic haem-atopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT): Technical recommendations for the use of Short Tandem Repeat (STR) based techniques, on behalf of the United Kingdom National External Quality Assessment Service for Leucocyte Immunophenotyping Chimerism Working Group. British Journal of Haematology 2015;168:26-37.
4. Elia L, Mazzi B, Margiotta M, Andreani M, Cervelli C, Papola F. Indicazioni Tecniche per lo studio del chimerismo post-trapianto di CSE (Cellule Staminali Ematopoietiche). Gruppo di Lavoro per il Chimerismo AIBT ver.1.1 https://aibt.it/media/uploads/files/Indicazioni_tecniche_per_lo_studio_del_chimerismo_post-trapianto_di_CSE._vers_1.1_-_2016_EFmfDOL.pdf (ultimo accesso: maggio 2023).
5. Tran SD, Pillemer SR, Dutra A, Barrett AJ, Brownstein MJ, Key S, et al. Differentiation of human bone marrow-derived cells into buccal epithelial cells in vivo: a molecular analytical study. Lancet 2003;361:1084-8.
6. Berger B, Parson R, Clausen J, Berger C, Nachbaur D, Parson W. Chimerism in DNA of buccal swabs from recipi-ents after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantations: implications for forensic DNA testing. Int J Legal Med 2013;127:49-54.
7. Waterhouse M, Themeli M, Bertz H, Zoumbos N, Finke J, Spyridonidis A. Horizontal DNA Transfer from Donor to Host Cells as an Alternative Mechanism of Epithelial Chimerism after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Trans-plantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2011;17:319-29.
8. Gill P, Brenner CH, Buckleton JS, Carracedo A, Krawczak M, Mayr WR et al. DNA commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics: Recommendations on the interpretation of mixtures. Forensic Sci Int 2006;160:90-101.
9. Genetisti Forensi Italiani GeFI, Raccomandazioni Ge.F.i. nelle indagini di identificazione personale, 2018, https://www.gefi-isfg.org/index.php?idpagina=18. (ultimo accesso: maggio 2023)