• Passa al contenuto principale
BC

biochimica clinica

it_IT Italian
it_IT Italian en_US English
  • Home
  • Casi clinici
  • Ahead of print e Ultimo Fascicolo - Accedi per visualizzare gli articoli
  • Archivio BC fino a 2024
  • Sottometti un articolo
  • Norme Autori
  • Cerca

CONTRIBUTI SCIENTIFICI – Scientific Papers

Volume:

Biochimica Clinica 2015; 39(6) 568-574

Pubblicato on-line:

DOI:

Scarica in PDF:

Il progetto pilota SIBioC di VEQ della misura dell’emoglobina glicata

AUTORI

Andrea Mosca1, Renata Paleari1, Anna Carobene2, Ferruccio Ceriotti2 per il Gruppo di Studio SIBioC - Medicina di Laboratorio Diabete Mellito
1Centro per la Riferibilità Metrologica in Medicina di Laboratorio (CIRME), Dipartimento di Fisiopatologia medico-chirurgica e dei trapianti, Università degli Studi di Milano
2Laboratorio di Standardizzazione, Servizio Medicina di Laboratorio, Ospedale San Raffaele, Milano

ABSTRACT

Pilot SIBioC EQAS project on glycated hemoglobin measurement

Two fresh blood samples collected with EDTA were distributed by courier in December 2014 to 206 Italian laboratories asking for the determination of their HbA1c concentrations. Target HbA1c values were assigned by the IFCC reference measurement procedure based on HPLC capillary electrophoresis. The results, collected from 193 laboratories using analytical systems mainly from five manufacturers (Bio-Rad Laboratories, A. Menarini Diagnostics, Roche Diagnostics, Sebia and Tosoh), showed a global variability (in terms of CV) of 5.3% and 3.8% at HbA1c values of 37.4 mmol/mol (sample 1) and 62.0 mmol/mol (sample 2), respectively. Globally, 84% of the participants reported HbA1c results within the total allowable error (TE) of 8.6% (sample 1) and 93% for sample 2. These percentages decreased to 70% and 77%, respectively, when using a goal for the allowable TE of 6.0% as criterion. Inter-laboratory CVs, calculated per group of methods, were between 3.3% and 5.0% and between 2.2% and 3.7% for sample 1 and 2, respectively. Tosoh users registered the smaller inter-laboratory CV in sample 1 and Sebia’s in sample 2. With regard to trueness, all methods had a mean bias ≤2.8% respect to the target values, with the exception of Tosoh (bias of +6.1% and +5.8%, for samples 1 and 2, respectively).

BIBLIOGRAFIA

HOME
PRIVACY POLICY
5x1000 Docemus

LOGO SIBioC

EDITORE RESPONSABILE
Alberto Oliaro

EDITORIAL SECRETARY
Edizioni Minerva Medica S.p.A.
Corso Bramante 83-85, 10126 Torino
T +39 011 678282
journals.dept@minervamedica.it

Designed by Biomedia srl
© 2025 SIBioC
P. IVA IT 06484860967