• Skip to main content
BC

biochimica clinica

en_US English
en_US English it_IT Italian
  • Home
  • Casi clinici
  • Ahead of print e Ultimo Fascicolo - Accedi per visualizzare gli articoli
  • Archivio BC fino a 2024
  • Sottometti un articolo
  • Norme Autori
  • Cerca

CONTRIBUTI SCIENTIFICI – Scientific Papers

Volume:

Biochimica Clinica 2015; 39(6) 591-594

Pubblicato on-line:

DOI:

Scarica in PDF:

Indagine sulla modalità di refertazione dell’esame D-dimero nei laboratori nazionali e indicazioni per una sua armonizzazione

AUTORI

Giuseppe Lippi1, Benedetto Morelli2, Armando Tripodi3
1Laboratory of Clinical Chemistry and Hematology, Academic Hospital of Parma
2Hemostasis and Thrombosis Center, General Hospital of Legnano (MI)
3Angelo Bianchi Bonomi Hemophilia and Thrombosis Center, Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, IRCCS Cà Granda Maggiore Hospital Foundation and University of Milan, Milan

ABSTRACT

A survey on D-dimer test reporting in Italian laboratories and some suggestions for its harmonization

D-dimer assessment represents a cornerstone in the diagnostic approach and therapeutic management of several thrombotic disorders, namely venous thromboembolism and disseminated intravascular coagulation. Nevertheless, this test is still plagued by an insufficient degree of analytical and post-analytical standardization. In particular, despite the existence of national guidelines, result reporting is quite heterogeneous. A specific on-line, 5-item questionnaire was disseminated to the SIBioC members to obtain a picture of the current national situation. As regards to the units, a modest prevalence (53%) of D-dimer unit (DDU) over fibrinogen equivalent unit (FEU) (47%) was found. The most widespread measurement unit was “ng/mL” (60%), followed by “μg/L” (18%), “mg/L” (15%) and “μg/mL” (6%). The vast majority of laboratories (90%) did not use an age-adjusted cut-off. The data distribution did not differ among different types of healthcare settings (i.e., general hospital, university hospital or private facilities). The use of at least 16 different unit approaches for D-dimer emerged from the survey is quite alarming and calls for a standardization, using a single result reporting as .

BIBLIOGRAFIA

HOME
PRIVACY POLICY
5x1000 Docemus

LOGO SIBioC

EDITORE RESPONSABILE
Alberto Oliaro

EDITORIAL SECRETARY
Edizioni Minerva Medica S.p.A.
Corso Bramante 83-85, 10126 Torino
T +39 011 678282
journals.dept@minervamedica.it

Designed by Biomedia srl
© 2025 SIBioC
P. IVA IT 06484860967