• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
BC

biochimica clinica

en_US English
en_US English it_IT Italian

CASI CLINICI – Case Reports

Volume:

Biochimica Clinica 2020; 44(4) e30-e33

Published on-line:

October 16, 2020

DOI:

10.19186/BC_2020.048

Download in PDF:

Una complicata valutazione della risposta alla terapia in un paziente con malattia da deposito di catene leggere libere
A complicated evaluation of the response to the therapy in a patient with light chain deposition disease

AUTHORS

Jessica Ripepi1, Marco Basset1, Paolo Milani1, Mario Nuvolone1, Andrea Foli1, Margherita Bozzola1, Tiziana Bosoni2, Riccardo Albertini2, Giovanni Palladini1
1Centro per lo Studio e la Cura delle Amiloidosi Sistemiche, Laboratorio Biochimica - Biotecnologie e Diagnostica avanzata, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Dipartimento di Medicina Molecolare, Università di Pavia
2Servizio di Analisi Chimico Cliniche, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia

ABSTRACT

A complicated evaluation of the response to the therapy in a patient with light chain deposition disease

Light chain deposition disease (LCDD) is characterized by tissue deposition, mostly in the kidney, of monoclonal immunoglobulin light chains (LCs), causing renal dysfunction and end-stage renal disease. The main goal of therapy is the reduction of LCs concentration, that can be obtained using chemotherapy approaches. We report the case of a 28-year-old man with LCDD (IgGκ type) and underlying multiple myeloma who, after three ineffective lines of therapy, started a treatment with daratumumab, a monoclonal antibody (mAb, IgG1κ type) drug, recently introduced for multiple myeloma treatment. The drug seemed effective but a IgGκ spike remained visible at standard immunofixation. To discriminate the drug from the patient monoclonal component, immunofixation with Hydrashift system was used. This tool identified the visible IgGκ as mAb drug and complete response was documented. This case showed the utility of new clinical assays for the evaluation of response to therapy in patients treated with mAb drugs.

REFERENCES